Opinion
No. 05-10784.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed January 10, 2008.
Hartley M.K. West, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Hilary A. Fox, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-40122-CW.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, respondent's unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted.