From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Gutierrez-Jimenez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 3, 2008
304 F. App'x 493 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-10594.

Submitted November 24, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed December 3, 2008.

John Zachary Boyle, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Joel Gutierrez-Jimenez, White Deer, PA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-01504-FJM.

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Joel Gutierrez-Jimenez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gutierrez-Jimenez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Gutierrez-Jimenez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 3, 2008
304 F. App'x 493 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Gutierrez-Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel GUTIERREZ-JIMENEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 3, 2008

Citations

304 F. App'x 493 (9th Cir. 2008)