From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Gray

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 27, 2010
No. 1:10-cr-07 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 27, 2010)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cr-07.

September 27, 2010


ORDER


Defendant Gray filed a motion to exclude hearsay evidence. (ECF No. 67.) Defendant requested the court exclude tape recording of a transaction and a video posted on the internet site YouTube. The Government filed a response. (ECF No. 70.)

For the reasons given on the record, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The audio recording is admissible. The Government has not yet established the admissibility of the internet video. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: September 27, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. Gray

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 27, 2010
No. 1:10-cr-07 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 27, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH SCOTT GRAY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 27, 2010

Citations

No. 1:10-cr-07 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 27, 2010)