From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Goldston

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 25, 2011
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02153-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-02153-PAB-KLM.

January 25, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on plaintiff United States' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) [Docket No. 256] and defendants Nancy Goldston and David Goldston's Motion for Final Judgment [Docket No. 261]. Plaintiff's motion is fully briefed, see Docket Nos. 257, 258; however, plaintiff has not responded to the Goldstons' motion for final judgment.

On March 31, 2010, judgment entered in this case in favor of plaintiff and against all remaining defendants, including the Goldstons and W.W. Investment Group, LLC as trustee of Old Times Holding Trust and High Mountain Holding Trust [Docket No. 248]. The judgment decreed that defendant David W. Goldston was the true and beneficial owner of the properties at issue, and that the other entities involved in the case were nominees and alter egos of Mr. Goldston. Docket No. 248 at 2. The judgment further decreed that the United States had federal tax liens against the properties that were the subject of this litigation, but that these tax liens could only be foreclosed upon in the event that a final judgment was entered in United States v. Goldston, Civ. No. 8:06-cv-01873-JSM-TBM (M.D. Fla.) finding that Mr. Goldston had an outstanding tax liability for the 1991 tax year. Docket No. 248 at 3.

On April 6, 2010, plaintiff advised the Court that the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida found in Mr. Goldston's favor and that as a result it was adjudged that Mr. Goldston did not have an outstanding tax liability for the 1991 year [Docket No. 249]. Thus, as plaintiff states in its motion for voluntary dismissal, a foreclosure order is no longer necessary. Moreover, the prior judgment disposed of all the defendants and claims pending in this case, despite being predicated on the final judgment from the Middle District of Florida. Therefore, plaintiff is correct that there is no further issue before the Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) [Docket No. 256] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Final Judgment [Docket No. 261] is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that final judgment shall enter in this matter in accordance with the Court's previous Judgment [Docket No. 248].

DATED January 25, 2011.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Goldston

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 25, 2011
Civil Action No. 06-cv-02153-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 25, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Goldston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID W. GOLDSTON, individually…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 25, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-02153-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 25, 2011)