Opinion
Case No. 07-CR-284.
February 21, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
The defendant, Daniel Goldsmith ("Goldsmith"), brought a motion to suppress the search (pursuant to a warrant) conducted in the above-captioned case. Specifically, Goldsmith argued that, while probable cause existed for the warrant issuance, the affidavit supporting the warrant failed to establish probable cause for the search of the automobile that was ultimately conducted.
Magistrate Judge Aaron E. Goodstein recommended Goldsmith's motion be denied. Goldsmith opposed the Recommendation and this Court has now reviewed the record and other submissions and rules as follows. Goldsmith's motion is DENIED.
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Goodstein's Recommendation in toto and the rationale supporting same.
SO ORDERED.