From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Gardner

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 22, 2008
266 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2008)

Summary

rejecting Gardner's argument that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment "because [his] predicate convictions were neither admitted by him nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt"

Summary of this case from Gardner v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 07-4758.

Submitted: January 17, 2008.

Decided: January 22, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06-cr-00422-PJM).

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Paresh S. Patel, Staff Attorney, Lisa W. Lunt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Emily N. Glatfelter, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Kenneth Lee Gardner pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and was sentenced as an armed career criminal to the mandatory minimum term of fifteen years imprisonment under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West 2000 Supp. 2007). Gardner appeals his sentence. We affirm.

Gardner argues that his sentence violates the Sixth Amendment under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the predicate convictions were neither admitted by him nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As Gardner concedes, we have rejected this argument in previous decisions. See United States v. Williams, 461 F.3d 441, 452 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 616, 166 L.Ed.2d 457 (2006); United States v. Cheek, 415 F.3d 349, 354 (4th Cir. 2005).

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Gardner

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 22, 2008
266 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2008)

rejecting Gardner's argument that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment "because [his] predicate convictions were neither admitted by him nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt"

Summary of this case from Gardner v. U.S.

rejecting Gardner's argument that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment "because [his] predicate convictions were neither admitted by him nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt"

Summary of this case from Gardner v. United States
Case details for

U.S. v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Lee GARDNER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

266 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Gardner v. U.S.

The Fourth Circuit rejected Gardner's appeal by a decision dated January 22, 2008. United States v. Gardner,…

Gardner v. United States

The Fourth Circuit rejected Gardner's appeal by a decision dated January 22, 2008. United States v. Gardner,…