From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Gardeley

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 28, 2010
2:08-CR-00061-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2010)

Opinion

2:08-CR-00061-PMP-RJJ.

June 28, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is Defendant Marque Gardeley's, Motion to Suppress (Doc. #29) filed on July 31, 2009. On May 11, 2010, the Honorable Robert J. Johnston, United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #65) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. #29) should be denied.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that Magistrate Judge Johnston's Report and Recommendation should be Affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #65) is Affirmed and Defendant Marque Gardeley's Motion to Suppress (Doc. #29) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Gardeley

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jun 28, 2010
2:08-CR-00061-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Gardeley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARQUE GARDELEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jun 28, 2010

Citations

2:08-CR-00061-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Jun. 28, 2010)