Opinion
03-CR-33.
August 16, 2005
ORDER
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). On July 25, 2005, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants' omnibus motions be denied to the extent that they seek suppression of the evidence obtained pursuant to the various eavesdrop orders.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties. No objections having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, defendants' omnibus motions are denied to the extent that they seek suppression of the evidence obtained pursuant to the various eavesdrop orders.
The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.