U.S. v. Galati

3 Citing cases

  1. U.S. v. Christmas

    Criminal No. 04-CR-611-3 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2005)

    Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(c)(1). An indictment is sufficient if it includes the elements of the offenses charged, apprises the defendant of what he or she must be prepared to defend against at trial, and enables the defendant to show with accuracy to what extent he or she may plead an acquittal or conviction as a bar to subsequent prosecutions. See Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 117 (1974); United States v. Galati, 853 F. Supp. 152, 154 (E.D. Pa. 1994). "[N]o greater specificity than the statutory language is required so long as there is sufficient factual orientation to permit the defendant to prepare his defense and to invoke double jeopardy in the event of a subsequent prosecution." United States v. Rankin, 870 F.2d 109, 112 (3d Cir. 1989).

  2. U.S. v. ALI

    Criminal No. 04-CR-611-1 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 14, 2005)   Cited 1 times

    Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(c)(1). An indictment is sufficient if it includes the elements of the offenses charged, apprises the defendant of what he or she must be prepared to defend against at trial, and enables the defendant to show with accuracy to what extent he or she may plead an acquittal or conviction as a bar to subsequent prosecutions. See Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 117 (1974); United States v. Galati, 853 F. Supp. 152, 154 (E.D. Pa. 1994). "[N]o greater specificity than the statutory language is required so long as there is sufficient factual orientation to permit the defendant to prepare his defense and to invoke double jeopardy in the event of a subsequent prosecution." United States v. Rankin, 870 F.2d 109, 112 (3d Cir. 1989).

  3. U.S. v. Blackwell

    954 F. Supp. 944 (D.N.J. 1997)   Cited 40 times
    Admitting financial audit where this type of record was created and maintained in the ordinary course of the preparer's business

    The sufficiency of an indictment may not be properly challenged by a pretrial motion on the ground that it is not supported by adequate evidence. Knox, 396 U.S. at 83 n. 7, 90 S.Ct. at 367 n. 7; United States v. Donsky, 825 F.2d 746, 751 (3d Cir. 1987); United States v. Gunter, 631 F.2d 583, 586 (8th Cir. 1980); United States v. Gallagher, 602 F.2d 1139, 1142 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1043, 100 S.Ct. 729, 62 L.Ed.2d 728 (1980); United States v. Galati, 853 F. Supp. 152, 154 (E.D.Pa. 1994). B. Money Laundering Under Section 1956(a)(1)(B)(i)