U.S. v. Gabaldon

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FRANK GABALDON…

Court: United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: May 11, 2009

CIV 06-0343 WJ/KBM CR 02-1056 WJ (D.N.M. May. 11, 2009)

Opinion

CIV 06-0343 WJ/KBM CR 02-1056 WJ.

May 11, 2009

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

WILLIAM JOHNSON, District Judge

The Magistrate Judge filed her proposed findings on March 6, 2009, recommending that Defendant's that the § 2255 petition be denied and that other motions be denied as moot. See Doc. 53. She granted Defendant a generous extension in which to file his objections, which he has, but the Clerk mis-docketed them as being filed by the United States. See Docs. 54-57. I have carefully reviewed all the objections de novo. They assert that the Magistrate Judge's analysis of the merits is biased and distorted. I disagree and find the objections utterly baseless.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 53) is ADOPTED;

2. The § 2255 petition (see Docs. 1, 4) is DENIED;

3. The other motions (Docs. 51, 52) are DENIED as moot; and

4. A final order enter concurrently herewith.