From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Friedman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CR. S-03-0060 WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. CR. S-03-0060 WBS.

August 9, 2006


ORDER


Defendant Donald M. Friedman, in propria persona, has filed a Motion for Reappointment of Counsel to handle a proposed "Motion for Expungement of Arrest and All Related Proceedings" and/or a Petition for a Writ if Habeas Corpus in relation to this case. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in collateral proceedings such as those defendant proposes to file. See, e.g., Irwin v. United States, 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969).

However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Defendant's moving papers appear to be predicated on the same kinds of delusional arguments which resulted previously in his being found incompetent to stand trial. Under the circumstances, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion for reappointment of counsel be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Friedman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CR. S-03-0060 WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD M. FRIEDMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2006

Citations

No. CR. S-03-0060 WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)