Opinion
Case No. 10-11294.
August 17, 2010
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2).
This is a student loan case. In 1995, defendant obtained a loan in the principle amount of $63,501.80 at a 9% interest rate. Defendant defaulted on the loan in April 2001. In 2010, plaintiff sued to obtain judgment on the debt, which plaintiff now says is $162,340.69. Defendant, who is proceeding pro se, filed an answer and affirmative defenses. On April 19, 2010, plaintiff served defendant with Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests to Admit. Defendant did not timely respond.
On June 1, 2010, plaintiff filed the instant motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff says that summary judgment is appropriate under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 based on defendant's failure to respond to the requests to admit and under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 because the evidence, particularly the Certificate of Indebtedness, conclusively establishes defendant's obligation.
Defendant has not responded to the motion. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's motion and supporting exhibits and finds it to be well-taken. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in plaintiffs brief, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed final judgment within ten (10) days.
On June 2, 2010, the Court issued an Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, requiring defendant to file a response to the summary judgment motion on or before July 9, 2010. To date, no response has been filed.
SO ORDERED.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, August 17, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.