From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Fraire-Gonzalez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 8, 2007
253 F. App'x 422 (5th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-50190 Conference Calendar.

November 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender's Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:06-CR-1701-ALL.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Amador Fraire-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Fraire-Gonzalez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 8, 2007
253 F. App'x 422 (5th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Fraire-Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Amador FRAIRE-GONZALEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 8, 2007

Citations

253 F. App'x 422 (5th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Fraire-Gonzalez v. U.S.

530 U.S. 466, 487 (2000) (suggesting that Almendarez-Torres represents "at best an exceptional departure from…