From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Forbes

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 2009
CRIMINAL NO. 1:03-CR-0250 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2009)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:03-CR-0250.

November 25, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2009, upon consideration of defendant's pro se motion (Doc. 1274) for reconsideration of the memorandum and order of court (Doc. 1271) dated October 19, 2009, wherein the court denied defendant's motion (Doc. 1238) to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence. . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 1274) for reconsideration is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Forbes

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 2009
CRIMINAL NO. 1:03-CR-0250 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Forbes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MICHAEL D. FORBES

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 25, 2009

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:03-CR-0250 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2009)