U.S. v. Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF SUN CONSTRUCTION…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Civil Case No. 07-cv-01355-LTB-MJW (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 07-cv-01355-LTB-MJW.

November 1, 2010

ORDER

LEWIS BABCOCK, Chief District Judge

THIS MATTER is before me on several motions filed by the parties. On November 1, 2010, I heard arguments on the following motions: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine, filed October 12, 2010 (docket #213); Intervenor Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Richard Kerr Under Fed.R.Evid. 702, filed October 15, 2010 (docket #215); Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Personal or Business Hardships Suffered by Sun Construction or its Principals, filed October 21, 2010 (docket #217); Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Supplemental Mandatory Disclosures, filed October 25, 2010 (docket #225); and Intervenor Plaintiff's Cross Motion to Compel, filed October 29, 2010 (docket #233). For the reasons stated on the record, it is HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff's Motion in Limine, filed October 12, 2010 (docket #213) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be addressed at the appropriate time during trial if necessary;

Intervenor Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Richard Kerr Under Fed.R.Evid. 702, filed October 15, 2010 (docket #215) shall be addressed at the appropriate time during trial;

Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Personal or Business Hardships Suffered by Sun Construction or its Principals, filed October 21, 2010 (docket #217) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be addressed at the appropriate time during trial if necessary;

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Supplemental Mandatory Disclosures, filed October 25, 2010 (docket #225) is DENIED; and

Intervenor Plaintiff's Cross Motion to Compel, filed October 29, 2010 (docket #233) is DENIED.

Dated: November 1, 2010.