From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Farrugia

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 13, 2007
234 F. App'x 780 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 06-10344, 06-10521.

Submitted July 9, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). The request for oral argument is denied.

Filed July 13, 2007.

Kevin P. Rooney, Esq., USF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas R. Farrugia, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Robert E. Coyle, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-92-05164-REC.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and BERZON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Thomas R. Farrugia appeals pro se from the district court's orders denying his motions to compel the government to 1) perform tests on certain trial exhibits; 2) provide samples of the exhibits to attorney Cheryl Sturm for testing; and 3) provide him with documents related to the exhibits.

Farrugia's motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the brief and supplemental excerpts of record received on May 23, 2007.

The district court properly concluded that Farrugia's motions are unrelated to any actions currently pending. Accordingly, the district court's orders denying the motions and denying the motion for reconsideration are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Farrugia

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 13, 2007
234 F. App'x 780 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Farrugia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas R. FARRUGIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 13, 2007

Citations

234 F. App'x 780 (9th Cir. 2007)