From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Farris

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 31, 2022
3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK

08-31-2022

USA v. GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's renewed Motion to Compel, (Doc. No. 194), and Motion to Show Cause, (Doc. No. 195).

The defendant asks the Court to compel his former lawyer, Roderick Glenn Davis, “to release all case files in his possession” to the defendant. (Doc. No. 194: Motion at 1). “Under N.C. Rules of Prof'l Conduct R. 1.16(d), ‘[u]pon termination of representation, a lawyer shall takes [sic] steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client's interests, such as ... surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled.” United States v. Barefoot, 609 Fed.Appx. 157, 158 (4th Cir. 2015) (citing United States v. Basham, 789 F.3d 358, 388 (4th Cir. 2015)). However, under this District's Standard Discovery Order, a defendant is not entitled to retain documents produced by the government after disposition of the case. (Order at ¶ 23, March 30, 2018).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that former counsel, Roderick Glenn Davis, shall file a response to the Motion to Compel within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order stating whether he retains papers and property to which the defendant is entitled.

The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to Mr. Davis, the defendant, and the United States Attorney.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Farris

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 31, 2022
3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

U.S. v. Farris

Case Details

Full title:USA v. GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2022)