From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Farris

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 19, 2022
3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May. 19, 2022)

Opinion

3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK

05-19-2022

USA v. GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant's pro se Motion for Reconsideration, (Doc. No. 154), challenging a prior ruling that he had not shown trial counsel retained material about his case, (Doc. No. 148).

In a prior motion, the defendant stated to this Court that trial counsel Miranda J. Mills advised him in August 2019 that she sent her case files to the defendant's sentencing attorney, Roderick Davis. (Doc. No. 140: Motion at 2). In support of the instant motion, the defendant references his own letter to Ms. Mills reporting that Mr. Davis told him that that she did not forward any case files. (Doc. No. 154: Motion at 1). The Court finds that the defendant's divergent hearsay statements do not establish grounds to reconsider its prior ruling because he has still not shown that Ms. Mills retained material about his case.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider, (Doc. No. 154), is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Farris

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
May 19, 2022
3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May. 19, 2022)
Case details for

U.S. v. Farris

Case Details

Full title:USA v. GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: May 19, 2022

Citations

3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May. 19, 2022)