From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Everett

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Feb 15, 2011
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20061-01-KHV (D. Kan. Feb. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20061-01-KHV.

February 15, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On April 29, 2009, the Court sentenced defendant to 60 months imprisonment. See Judgment (Doc. #24). Defendant is currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institute in Texarkana, Texas. This matter is before the Court on defendant's letter (Doc. #32) which the Court received on January 18, 2011, and which the Court construes as a motion for transfer. Defendant states that his mother, who lives near Leavenworth, Kansas, is seriously ill. He asks the Court to transfer him to a prison camp or half-way house in Leavenworth so that his mother can visit him. For reasons set forth below, the Court overrules defendant's motion.

Defendant previously filed three motions asking for a reduction in his sentence. The Court overruled each of these motions, finding that the Court did not have jurisdiction to re-sentence defendant. See Doc. #26, 29, 31.

Decisions regarding classification and designation of inmates to a particular prison facility or program are vested within the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"). At sentencing, the Court recommended that defendant be placed as close to Kansas City as possible based on family proximity. See Judgment (Doc. #24) at 2. A sentencing court's recommendation, however, is not binding on the BOP. See Fajri v. Corrs. Corp. Am., No. 03-3202-SAC, 2007 WL 594726, at *2 n. 10 (D. Kan. Feb. 20, 2007). Although the BOP must consider the sentencing court's recommendation as to the appropriate penal or correctional facility, 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b)(4)(B), the final decision as to the prisoner's placement rests with the BOP. U.S. v. Lazo-Herrera, 927 F. Supp. 1472, 1472-73 (D. Kan. 1996) (citations omitted).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's letter (Doc. #32) which the Court received on January 18, 2011, and which the Court construes as a motion to transfer, be and hereby is OVERRULED.

Dated this 15th day of February, 2011, at Kansas City, Kansas.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Everett

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Feb 15, 2011
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20061-01-KHV (D. Kan. Feb. 15, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Everett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN EVERETT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Feb 15, 2011

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20061-01-KHV (D. Kan. Feb. 15, 2011)