From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Esquivel-Gomez

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 16, 2008
Case No. 1:08-cr-00026 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 16, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08-cr-00026.

December 16, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on December 4, 2008, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant Silvino Esquivel-Gomez entered a plea of guilty to Counts 3, 4 and 6 of the Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In Counts 3 and 6 of the Indictment, defendant is charged with making a false statement in an application for a United States Passport in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1542. In Count 4 of the Indictment, defendant is charged with using a means of identification in the form of a Texas birth certificate in the name of another person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7). On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to Counts 3, 4 and 6 of the Indictment be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge. The clerk is directed to procure a transcript of the plea hearing for review by the District Judge.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than ten days after the plea hearing. See W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1(d).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Esquivel-Gomez

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 16, 2008
Case No. 1:08-cr-00026 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 16, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Esquivel-Gomez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SILVINO ESQUIVEL-GOMEZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:08-cr-00026 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 16, 2008)