From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Enciso-Aceves

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 21, 2001
4 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


4 Fed.Appx. 449 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Rodrigo ENCISO-ACEVES, a/k/a Francisco Carreon Robles, a/k/a Manuel Lopez Casillas, a/k/a Manuel Morales Gonzalez, a/k/a Rodrigo Enciso Aceves, Defendant--Appellant. No. 99-50431. D.C. No. CR-98-01218-CM-1. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 21, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Defendant pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Carlos R. Moreno, J., to being a deported alien found in the United States, and he appealed conviction and sentence. The Court of Appeals held that prior aggravated felony conviction did not need to be admitted or proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury to be a sentencing factor.

Affirmed.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Carlos R. Moreno, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Rodrigo Enciso-Aceves appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Enciso-Aceves contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that Apprendi calls into question the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Enciso-Aceves's contentions, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Enciso-Aceves

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 21, 2001
4 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

U.S. v. Enciso-Aceves

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Rodrigo ENCISO-ACEVES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 2001

Citations

4 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2001)