From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Elwell

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 13, 2010
Crim. No. 09-864 (D.N.J. May. 13, 2010)

Opinion

Crim. No. 09-864.

May 13, 2010


ORDER


This matter having been opened to the Court on the joint application of the United States of America, Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney (Thomas R. Calcagni, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing) and defendants Dennis Elwell (by Thomas Cammarata and Jeffrey Garrigan, Esqs.) and Ronald Manzo (by Samuel DeLuca, Esq.) for an order continuing the proceedings and excluding time from computation under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974; the Court makes the following findings:

1. The charges in this case are the result of a lengthy investigation involving a large number of audio and video recordings;

2. In light of the above, defense counsel have represented to the Court that they require additional time to review discovery and to investigate the charges and file motions in this case;

3. The Court previously has found that this case is sufficiently complex that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and for the trial itself within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act of 1974;

4. The United States and both defendants consent to the granting of a continuance in this matter; and

5. In light of the complexity of the case, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii), an order granting a further continuance in this matter serves the ends of justice, and a failure to grant such a continuance would unreasonably deny counsel for the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and for good cause shown;

WHEREFORE, it is on this 12 day of May, 2010,

ORDERED THAT the proceedings in this matter shall be continued until June 17, 2010; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a case management conference shall be held on June 17, 2010, at 11 AM;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a motion schedule and/or a schedule for further proceedings will be set by the Court at that case management conference;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time period from the date of this order to the date of the case management conference shall be excluded from computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining provisions of the Order for Discovery and Inspection shall remain in full force and effect.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Elwell

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 13, 2010
Crim. No. 09-864 (D.N.J. May. 13, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Elwell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DENNIS ELWELL and RONALD MANZO

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: May 13, 2010

Citations

Crim. No. 09-864 (D.N.J. May. 13, 2010)