From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. E.F.B

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 21, 2007
220 F. App'x 745 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-30459.

Submitted February 8, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed February 21, 2007.

Lori Harper Suek, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David F. Ness, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00053-SEH.

Before: GRABER, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


A Juvenile appeals from the district court's adjudication, after a bench trial, that he is a delinquent for having committed an assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(3), 1153(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The Juvenile first argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and, more specifically, that the district court erroneously found that he intended to cause great bodily harm. We disagree. Despite inconsistent testimony among witnesses, a "rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt," Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), by crediting McCray's testimony. See United States v. Old Chief, 121 F.3d 448, 450 (9th Cir. 1997) (order) (holding that a rational trier of fact could choose to believe one witness over others who testified differently).

The Juvenile also contends that the district court erred in concluding that he did not act in self-defense. Again, we disagree. Even taking into consideration the victims' reputation and prior bad acts, the record demonstrates that the Juvenile was unjustified in the use of deadly force because he fired a sawed-off shotgun, twice, in response to McCray's holding either a bullwhip or a bar. See United States v. Reiser, 57 F.3d 847, 851-52 (9th Cir. 1995) (discussing elements of self-defense).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. E.F.B

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 21, 2007
220 F. App'x 745 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. E.F.B

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E.F.B., a Juvenile…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 2007

Citations

220 F. App'x 745 (9th Cir. 2007)