From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Earl

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 15, 2009
307 F. App'x 381 (11th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-10080 Non-Argument Calendar.

January 15, 2009.

Barre C. Dumas, Dumas McPhail, L.L.C., Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

David Andrew Sigler, U.S. Attorney's Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. D.C. Docket No. 06-00136-CRWS.

Before BLACK, BARRETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.


Barre C. Dumas, appointed counsel for Ervin Bernard Earl, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Earl's convictions are AFFIRMED. We note, however, that the judgment and the order memorializing the jury's verdict incorrectly substitute 18 U.S.C. § 1853 for 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Therefore, we VACATE and REMAND with instructions that the district court correct the judgment and the order memorializing the jury's verdict by replacing 18 U.S.C. § 1853 with 18 U.S.C. § 1513.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Earl

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 15, 2009
307 F. App'x 381 (11th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Earl

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ervin Bernard EARL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

307 F. App'x 381 (11th Cir. 2009)