From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Duran-Estrada

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 21, 2008
297 F. App'x 601 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-30000.

Submitted October 16, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 21, 2008.

Timothy J. Racicot, Esq., USMI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Evangelo Arvanetes, Esq., FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; William F. Downes, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-07-00030-WFD.

Before LEAVY, RYMER, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Francisco Duran-Estrada appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Duran-Estrada contends that the district court committed procedural error by failing to adequately explain his sentence and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary in light of his personal circumstances. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Duran-Estrada

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 21, 2008
297 F. App'x 601 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Duran-Estrada

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco DURAN-ESTRADA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

297 F. App'x 601 (9th Cir. 2008)