From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Duhart

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 12, 2010
379 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-13044 Non-Argument Calendar.

May 12, 2010.

Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, Federal Public Defender, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Anne R. Schultz, Kathleen M. Salyer, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. D.C. Docket No. 08-60309-CR-KAM.

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Donald Duhart in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duhart's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Duhart

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
May 12, 2010
379 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Duhart

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald DUHART…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: May 12, 2010

Citations

379 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Duhart

His convictions and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Duhart, 379 F. App'x 814, *1…

United States v. Duhart

His convictions and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Duhart, 379 F. App'x 814 (11th…