From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Dortch

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 14, 2000
203 F.3d 883 (5th Cir. 2000)

Opinion

No. 98-41129.

February 14, 2000.

David Haskell Henderson, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Denise S. Benson, Beaumont, TX, Amy R. Blalock, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Joe J. Fisher, Judge.

Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Dec. 23, 1999, 5th Cir. 1999, 199 F.3d 193, 203)


The petition for rehearing is DENIED. In response to the petition for rehearing, however, the court acknowledges that the evidence found at the residence is not necessarily to be excluded, given that there were independent sources of information that formed the basis of the search warrant for the house. Accordingly, the sentence indicating to the contrary is hereby deleted. See United States v. Dortch, 199 F.3d 193, 203 (5th Cir. 1999).

Judge Garwood dissents from denial of rehearing.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Dortch

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 14, 2000
203 F.3d 883 (5th Cir. 2000)
Case details for

U.S. v. Dortch

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CECIL ANTHONY DORTCH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 14, 2000

Citations

203 F.3d 883 (5th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Macias

“As we have stated, ‘[t]he Constitution [is] violated [ ] when the detention extend[s] beyond the valid…

United States v. Macias

"As we have stated, `[t]he Constitution [is] violated [ ] when the detention extend[s] beyond the valid…