From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Delgado

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 30, 2002
90 Crim. 091 (LAK), 94 Crim. 971 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2002)

Opinion

90 Crim. 091 (LAK), 94 Crim. 971 (LAK)

October 30, 2002


ORDER


Defendant has failed to comply with Local Crim. R. 16.1. Accordingly, his motion, dated September 6, 2002, is denied in all respects save that the government shall move in limine, no later than 10 days prior to the scheduled start of the trial, for a determination as to the admissibility of any Rule 404(b) evidence it proposes to use. See, e.g., United States v. Ming, No. 02 Crim. 0596 (LAK), 2002 WL 1949227, *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 22, 2002); United States v. Roberts, No. 01 Crim. 0410 (RWS), 2001 WL 1602213, at *12 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2001); United States v. Jailall, No. 01 Crim. 0069 (RWS), 2000 WL 1368055, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2000); United States v. Guevara, No. 99 Crim. 445 (AGS), 1999 WL 639720, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 1999); United States v. Ahmad, 992 F. Supp. 682, 684-85 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Delgado

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 30, 2002
90 Crim. 091 (LAK), 94 Crim. 971 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. Delgado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. LUIS DELGADO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 30, 2002

Citations

90 Crim. 091 (LAK), 94 Crim. 971 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2002)