From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Dedrick

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 12, 2006
No. 3:05CR240 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2006)

Opinion

No. 3:05CR240.

January 12, 2006


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the court upon defendant DC Assault Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Adopt Motion of Co-Defendant [doc. 45].

It is understood that the motion to continue on behalf of defendant Daniel Dedrick was also intended for defendant DC Technologies. Therefore, the motion is GRANTED.

The court finds the ends of justice served by taking such action outweighs the interest of the public and Defendant to a speedy trial as set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(1). The court further finds defendant John Wesley Rasmussen's trial of this matter should be continued along with co-defendants Dedrick DC Technolgies.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this trial be scheduled for the July 18, 2006 term at 10:00 a.m. as to all above-named defendants in the Charlotte Division.

The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to Defendant, counsel for Defendant, to the United States Attorney, the United States Marshals Service, and the U.S. Probation Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Dedrick

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 12, 2006
No. 3:05CR240 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Dedrick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Daniel Dedrick (1) John Wesley Rasmussen, II…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jan 12, 2006

Citations

No. 3:05CR240 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2006)