From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Dawson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 25, 2007
220 F. App'x 466 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-10229.

Argued and Submitted January 12, 2007.

Filed January 25, 2007.

Andrew W. Duncan, Esq., USLV — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Anne R. Traum, Esq., FPDNV — Federal Public Defender's Office, Las Vegas, NV, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00255-1-KJD.

Before: NOONAN, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Malcolm Dawson ("Dawson") pleaded guilty to bank robbery. He appeals his two-level sentence enhancement for committing robbery using a threat of death under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) (2003). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and affirm.

The district court found that Dawson told the bank teller he had a gun. It also found that this was an appropriate case in which to impose the § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) enhancement. "[U]nder most circumstances, a bank robber's statement that he has a gun is sufficient to instill a fear of death in a reasonable victim and therefore warrants the threat-of-death enhancement." United States v. Jennings, 439 F.3d 604, 605 (9th Cir. 2006). The record indicates that there were no unusual circumstances. The district court's findings were not clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Dawson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 25, 2007
220 F. App'x 466 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Dawson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm DAWSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 2007

Citations

220 F. App'x 466 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wooten

I don't want to use it. Just give me your money. Thanks.”); United States v. Dawson, 220 Fed.Appx. 466, 467…