From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Davis

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 23, 2024
3:19-CR-00093-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2024)

Opinion

3:19-CR-00093-RJC-DCK

02-23-2024

USA v. TONY OBRIAN DAVIS


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se to amend his presentence report (PSR). (Doc. No. 171).

The defendant asks the Court to change information about his drug use in order to qualify for the Residential Drug Abuse Program, 18 U.S.C. §3621(e). (Id. at 1). In the PSR, the defendant indicated that his daily drug use ended when he was 23, approximately 10 years prior to the instant offense, and that he had sold crack to pay for his drug addiction. (Doc. No. 179: PSR ¶ 103). The defendant did not object to that information at the sentencing hearing, and the Court noted his history of drug abuse and recommended him for the program. (Doc. No. 130: Sent. Hr'g Tr. at 12-15, 36-41, 46-47, 51). The defendant has not shown any basis in law or fact to alter the PSR long after it was adopted by the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Davis

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 23, 2024
3:19-CR-00093-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2024)
Case details for

U.S. v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:USA v. TONY OBRIAN DAVIS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2024

Citations

3:19-CR-00093-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2024)