From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Daane

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-30088.

Submitted February 20, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

February 23, 2007.

Carl E. Rostad, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory Powderface, Yankton, SD, pro se.

Brian Kohn, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00056-GH-SEH.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Gregory Powderface appeals from his 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to theft from an Indian Tribal Organization and filing a false tax return, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1163 and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Powderface contends that he did not abuse his position or any special skill to help facilitate or conceal any offense. We disagree and conclude that the district court properly enhanced his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. See United States v. Hill, 915 F.2d 502, 507-08 (9th Cir. 1990) (noting that the relevant question is whether the defendant "was in a superior position as a result of a trust relationship" as compared to "the public at large").

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Daane

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Daane

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory POWDERFACE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Citations

221 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Trent v. United States

Glenn Hurst TRENT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 475 F.3d 1114; 221 Fed.Appx. 508. Petition for…