From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Curiel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. 2:05-cr-0113 LKK JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cr-0113 LKK JFM.

December 10, 2010


ORDER


Respondent's previous motion to dismiss was denied without prejudice to its renewal. Respondent has not filed any further motions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer within forty-five days of the effective date of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings.

2. Respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the motion. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Movant's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, together with a copy of movant's motion, on the United States Attorney or his authorized representative.

DATED: December 9, 2010.


Summaries of

United States v. Curiel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. 2:05-cr-0113 LKK JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)
Case details for

United States v. Curiel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. SERGIO CURIEL, SR., Movant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 10, 2010

Citations

No. 2:05-cr-0113 LKK JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)