From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Cunningham

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
May 8, 2008
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:06CR68 (N.D.W. Va. May. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:06CR68.

May 8, 2008


ORDER/OPINION


It shall be recalled that on the 27th day of March 2008, came the Defendant, Mark Cunningham, in person and by his counsel, Edmund J. Rollo, and also came the United States by its Assistant United States Attorney, John Parr, for hearing on Defendant's pretrial motions. As part of the resolution of the pending motions, the Court ordered Defendant's Motion for Production of Transcripts (Docket Entry 173) be CONTINUED, directing counsel to identify the transcripts he was seeking, if any, and to request same pursuant to the CJA request process. A review of the docket in this matter to date, more than thirty (30) days after the hearing, reveals that counsel has not identified any transcripts.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Production of Transcripts (Docket Entry 173) is DENIED.

The Clerk of the Northern District for the United States District Court shall provide a copy of this order to all counsel of record.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Cunningham

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
May 8, 2008
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:06CR68 (N.D.W. Va. May. 8, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK CUNNINGHAM, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: May 8, 2008

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:06CR68 (N.D.W. Va. May. 8, 2008)