U.S. v. Cunningham

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID CUNNINGHAM, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 23, 2010

Criminal No. 07-0298 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 07-0298.

March 23, 2010

Order of Court

ARTHUR SCHWAB, District Judge

AND NOW, this 23^rd March, 2010, upon consideration of the foregoing Motion in Limine Concerning Pornographic Images and File Names (doc. no. 99), and government's response thereto (doc. no. 101), it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is DENIED. The parties may (but are not required to) use representative samples of the Child Pornography instead of the entire "collections," as well as the file names of the various files in the "collection". (See doc. no. 101). Additionally, the parties may (but are not required to) stipulate that the child pornography evidence constitutes child pornography for purposes of the Indictment.

Finally, the parties shall meet in an attempt to stipulate to a Joint Cautionary Jury Instruction similar to that set forth in the government's response (see doc. no. 101 at 7-8). Said instruction shall be jointly filed by March 25, 2010, or if no agreement is reached, separate instructions may be filed by March 25, 2010.

SO ORDERED.