From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Crockett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 5, 2008
280 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6227.

Submitted: May 29, 2008.

Decided: June 5, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:98-cr-00798-GRA-1).

Timothy Dale Crockett, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Timothy Dale Crockett appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion to modify restitution payments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crockett, No. 7:98-cr-00798-GRA-1, 2008 WL 153976 (D.S.C. Jan. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Crockett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 5, 2008
280 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Crockett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Dale CROCKETT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 2008

Citations

280 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2008)