From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Crimi

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Apr 17, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cr-154-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:05-cr-154-Orl-31JGG.

April 17, 2006


ORDER


Defendant has filed a Motion for Judgment of Acquittal or for New Trial (Doc. 583) and the government responded (Doc. 602). A judgment of acquittal is inappropriate because a reasonable fact finder, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the government, could conclude that the evidence establishes Defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Hernandez, 433 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 2005). The Motion for New Trial is without merit because the evidence does not preponderate heavily against the verdict, such that it would be a miscarriage of justice to let the verdict stand. Id. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Crimi

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Apr 17, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cr-154-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Crimi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILIP ROBERT CRIMI

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Apr 17, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:05-cr-154-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Apr. 17, 2006)