From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Crill

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 23, 2008
279 F. App'x 535 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-30042.

Submitted May 20, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed May 23, 2008.

Kris A. McLean, USMI — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John P. Rhodes, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Donald W. Molloy, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-01-00063-DWM.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Leona Crill appeals from the six-month sentence imposed following the revocation of her supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Crill contends that her sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing, and because the district court presumed the Guidelines range was reasonable without taking into account her gambling problems or positive work history. These contentions are belied by the record. We conclude that there was no procedural error and that Crill's sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-95 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 n. 5 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Crill

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 23, 2008
279 F. App'x 535 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Crill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Leona CRILL, Defendant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 23, 2008

Citations

279 F. App'x 535 (9th Cir. 2008)