From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Council, 301 Fed.Appx. 269

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 26, 2008
301 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6966.

Submitted: November 20, 2008.

Decided: November 26, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00097-GCM-20).

Herbert Council, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michel Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GEEGOEY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PEE CUEIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Herbert Council appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Council's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. In light of this disposition, we deny as moot Council's motion for emergency summary disposition by a single judge.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Council, 301 Fed.Appx. 269

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 26, 2008
301 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Council, 301 Fed.Appx. 269

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herbert COUNCIL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 26, 2008

Citations

301 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2008)