From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Conyers

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jan 24, 2011
Case No. 1:06-cr-69-09 COLLIER / LEE (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-cr-69-09 COLLIER / LEE.

January 24, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


FREGINALD CONYERS ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on January 18, 2011, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included:

(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government;
(2) Supervised Releasee; and
(3) Attorney Paul Bergmann for the Supervised Releasee.

After being sworn in due form of law, Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It was determined that Supervised Releasee wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. Attorney Bergmann was appointed to represent the Supervised Releasee. It was also determined that Supervised Releasee had been provided with and reviewed with counsel a copy of the Petition.

The Government moved that Supervised Releasee be detained without bail pending his revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier. Supervised Releasee requested both a preliminary hearing and a detention hearing, which were held.

Preliminary Examination and Detention Hearing Proof

AUSA Woods called U.S. Probation Officer Mike Stuart to testify to the factual allegations set forth in the petition. Attorney Bergmann cross-examined Officer Stuart as to the facts in the Petition and made proffers concerning the defendant's conduct and circumstances. Both parties presented their respective arguments concerning the issues of detention or release, which were fully considered by the Court.

Findings

(1) Based upon Officer Stuart's testimony, which was consistent with the facts in the petition, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe the defendant has committed violations of his condition of supervised release.
(2) The defendant has not carried his burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that, if released, he would not pose a danger to another person or to the community under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1(a)(6).

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) Supervised Releasee shall appear for a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Collier.
(2) The Government's motion that defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.
(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Conyers

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jan 24, 2011
Case No. 1:06-cr-69-09 COLLIER / LEE (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Conyers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FREGINALD CONYERS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:06-cr-69-09 COLLIER / LEE (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 24, 2011)