U.S. v. Cole

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY LEE COLE JR., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 6, 2011

2:02-CR-00424-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. May. 6, 2011)

Opinion

2:02-CR-00424-PMP-PAL.

May 6, 2011

ORDER

PHILIP PRO, District Judge

On May 2, 2011, the Court received the attached letter from Anthony Cole. It is self-explanatory.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff United States and former counsel for Defendant Anthony Lee Cole Jr., shall, not later than June 6, 2011, file any motions which they deem appropriate in light of Defendant Cole's letter.

DATED: May 5, 2011.

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA THE STATE OF NEVADA, Plaintiff, CASE NO. C257843 -vs- DEPT. NO. VIII. ANTHONY LEE COLE JR. #01170976 Defendant.

AMENDED JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION (PLEA OF GUILTY)

The Defendant previously appeared before the Court with counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the crimes of COUNT 1 — CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ROBBERY (Category B Felony) in violation of NRS 199.480, 200.380, and COUNT 2 — CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ROBBERY (Category B Felony) in violation of NRS 199.480, 200.380; thereafter, on the 25^th day of February, 2010, the Defendant was present in court for sentencing with counsel, and good cause appearing,

THE DEFENDANT WAS ADJUDGED guilty of said offenses and, in addition to the $25.00 Administrative Assessment Fee and $4,100.00 Restitution, the Defendant was sentenced to the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDC) as follows: as to COUNT 1 — to a MAXIMUM of SEVENTY-TWO (72) MONTHS with a MINIMUM parole eligibility of TWENTY-EIGHT (28) MONTHS; and as to COUNT 2 — to a MAXIMUM of SEVENTY-TWO (72) MONTHS with a MINIMUM parole eligibility of TWENTY-EIGHT (28) MONTHS, COUNT 2 to run CONSECUTIVE to COUNT 1 and THIS SENTENCE to run CONSECUTIVE to Federal time; with ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX (156) DAYS credit for time served. FURTHER, the $150.00 DNA Analysis Fee including testing to determine genetic markers was WAIVED.

THEREAFTER, on the 24^th day of March, 2010, the Defendant was not present in court with his counsel, WENDY LEIK, ESQ., and pursuant to Defendant's motion to modify sentence, and good cause appearing to amend the Judgment of Conviction; now therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Defendant's sentence to be amended to reflect: COUNTS 1 2 to run CONSECUTIVE with each other and THIS CASE to run CONCURRENT to Federal case.

DATED this 29TH day of March, 2010.