From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Coker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2012 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2012 JAM DAD.

July 30, 2010


ORDER


This case came before the court on July 30, 2010, for hearing on plaintiff's motion to compel defendant's appearance at deposition and her responses to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories, first request for production of documents, and first set of requests for admissions. Kurt Alexander Didier, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appeared for plaintiff. Robert Earl McCann, Esq., appeared for defendant.

Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement and their arguments in open court, and for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, plaintiff's July 9, 2010 motion to compel (Doc. No. 23) is granted in its entirety.

Within fifteen days after the assigned district judge issues any order that denies defendant's pending motion to dismiss, defendant shall submit to deposition in the Office of the United States Attorney in North Carolina and shall serve responses without objection to plaintiff's written discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Coker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2012 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Coker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBBIN M. COKER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 30, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2012 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2010)