From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Cofield

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 19, 2007
229 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7731.

Submitted: June 15, 2007.

Decided: June 19, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00099-MJG).

Keenan Kester Cofield, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Keenan Kester Cofield appeals the district court's marginal order denying his motion to reconsider, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), the denial of his "motion to correct sentence." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cofield's motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Cofield

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 19, 2007
229 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Cofield

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Keenan Kester COFIELD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 19, 2007

Citations

229 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2007)