From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 2, 2009
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-508 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2009)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-508.

October 2, 2009


MEMORANDUM


Presently before the Court are three pro se motions of James Clark. The first, "Motion to Vacate Guilty Verdict Pursuant To Fed R. Crime P. 39 33 and Requests A New Trial", (Doc. No. 39); the second, "Motion to Set aside Conviction for use of Perjured Testimony and Motion to Vacate", (Doc. No. 40); and third, "Motion to Exclude Material in PSR Sentencing Memorandum and Objections", (Doc. No. 41).

A Defendant who is represented by counsel has no Sixth Amendment right to file papers pro se or to participate as co-counsel. United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457 (1975); U.S. v. Cyphers, 556 F.2d 630 (1977) and Hall v. Dorsey, 534 F. Supp. 503 (1982).

For these reasons we decline to consider Clark's pro se motions and they will be dismissed.

An appropriate Order follows.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 2, 2009
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-508 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES CLARK

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 2, 2009

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 08-508 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2009)