From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ciszkowski

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 11, 2008
CASE NO.: 8:05-cr-36-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 11, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 8:05-cr-36-T-23TBM.

July 11, 2008


ORDER


On August 21, 2007, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed (Doc. 136) the defendant's conviction and sentence and no motion has been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The defendant currently has no pending matter in this court.

The defendant moves (Doc. 140, 141) for copies of his criminal case docket sheet and trial transcripts without cost to aid in his preparation of a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. However, Harless v. United States, 329 F.2d 397 (11th Cir. 1964), provides that, "A federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error." Should the defendant file a proper motion pursuant to Section 2255, he may renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and renew his request for transcripts. United States v. Lewis, 37 F.3d 1510 (table), 1994 WL 563442 (10th Cir. 1994); Skinner v. United States, 434 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1970); Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1970). See also United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 96 S. Ct. 2086 (1976). The defendant's motion for copies without cost is DENIED.

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ciszkowski

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 11, 2008
CASE NO.: 8:05-cr-36-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 11, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ciszkowski

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WOJTEK CISZKOWSKI

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jul 11, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 8:05-cr-36-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 11, 2008)