From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Chudy

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 11, 2009
331 F. App'x 514 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-30433.

Submitted August 4, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 11, 2009.

Michael S. Lahr, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel C. Chudy, David F. Ness, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 6:05-cr-00016-CCL.

Before PREGERSON, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Defendant Daniel C. Chudy appeals the district court's denial of his conditional release from federal custody at a mental health facility. Specifically, the district court determined that Chudy has failed to prove "by clear and convincing evidence that his release [from federal custody] would not create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage of property of another due to a present mental disease or defect," 18 U.S.C. § 4243(d). We affirm.

The district court's factual findings in a release hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243 are reviewed for "clear error." See United States v. Phelps, 955 F.2d 1258, 1267 (9th Cir. 1992). The district court did not clearly err after considering the evidence presented at the release hearing in concluding that Chudy failed to meet his burden of proof.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Chudy

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 11, 2009
331 F. App'x 514 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Chudy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel C. CHUDY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2009

Citations

331 F. App'x 514 (9th Cir. 2009)