From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Chavarria-Jimenez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
264 F. App'x 580 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-10074.

Submitted January 14, 2008.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 18, 2008.

Don B. Overall, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter Hormel, Esq., Law Office of Peter Hormel, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00441-CKJ.

Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Salvador Chavarria-Jimenez appeals from his 48-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Chavarria-Jimenez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Chavarria-Jimenez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the sentence is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Chavarria-Jimenez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
264 F. App'x 580 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Chavarria-Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Salvador…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2008

Citations

264 F. App'x 580 (9th Cir. 2008)