From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Chambers, 301 Fed.Appx. 204

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
301 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-7248.

Submitted: November 20, 2008.

Decided: December 1, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:94-cr-00089-JRS-1).

George Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


George Chambers seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its order denying the motion for reduction of sentence on June 19, 2008. Chambers filed the notice of appeal, at earliest, on July 10, 2008, after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Chambers has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

Because Chambers was then incarcerated and not represented by counsel, this filing date is determined pursuant to Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266.276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

REMAND.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Chambers, 301 Fed.Appx. 204

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
301 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Chambers, 301 Fed.Appx. 204

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George CHAMBERS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 2008

Citations

301 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2008)