From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Castro

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 18, 2010
365 F. App'x 491 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7788.

Submitted: January 27, 2010.

Decided: February 18, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00054-sgw-mfu-1).

Juan Evangelista Castro, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Juan Evangelista Castro appeals from the district court's garnishment disposition order directing the Virginia State Police to pay the Government $9,849. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Castro, No. 5:06-cr-00054-sgw-mfu-1, 2007 WL 2021882 (W.D.Va. Sept. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Although Castro appears to correctly assert that the garnishee improperly failed to serve him with its answer to the garnishment writ, Castro fails to explain on appeal the objections he would have raised to the answer had he been served. Because Castro fails to show prejudice, we conclude that the irregularity in the processing of the garnishment action was harmless.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Castro

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 18, 2010
365 F. App'x 491 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Evangelista CASTRO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

365 F. App'x 491 (4th Cir. 2010)