Opinion
Criminal Action No. 96-CR-460-D.
March 13, 2006
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a pro se pleading filed by Tony Leonard Carver on March 7, 2006, entitled "Motion for Reconsideration of the Exparte Complaint Pursuant to Rule (60)(b)(4) Regarding `Void Judgment'" (the "Motion"). It appears that the Motion seeks reconsideration of this Court's February 6, 2006, Order denying Mr. Carver's request to file an "Exparte Complaint in the Nature of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(4)." In the February 6, 2006, Order, this Court determined that Mr. Carver was attempting to file a second or successive motion pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255. I denied Mr. Carver's request because his initial 2255 motion had been denied. In the Motion currently pending, Mr. Carver again seeks to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence imposed in this criminal case. Nothing in Mr. Carver's Motion persuades me that I should vacate or modify the February 6, 2006, Order. Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that Mr. Carver's Motion for Reconsideration of the Exparte Complaint Pursuant to Rule (60)(b)(4) Regarding Void Judgment, filed March 7, 2006, is DENIED.